Just read between the lines...

Red Text is the real story hiding between the lines.
Violet Text is a notable quote from a specific blogger.
Blue Text is my own personal commentary.
Gold Text is a link to the original sources.

One word of advice I would offer to everyone who reads this blog;

....Each and every day, take just a moment of your precious time to pray for Peace and Justice.

Showing posts with label Wolfowitz World Bank Scandal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wolfowitz World Bank Scandal. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Wet and Cool Tuesday Morning

Red text is the "real" story buried in the news.
Blue text is my own commentary.
Violet text is the blog quote of the day.

BLOG QUOTE OF THE DAY
from Brad Friedman at BRADBLOG.COM
EXCLUSIVE: FBI AGENT WHO INTERCEDED IN ANN COULTER VOTER FRAUD CASE ALLEGED TO BE HER FORMER BOYFRIEND! Palm Beach Paper Says FBI Agent Attempted to Clear GOP Pundit, BRAD BLOG Guest Blogger Said to be Reason for Fraudulent Info Given on FLVoter Registration Form, Driver's License! Conservative Coulter Critic Borchers Responds; Says Her '98-'99 Boyfriend Has Been 'Her Personal FBI Resource for Her Own Purposes' The Ann Coulter Voter Fraud case, which we've been covering for more than a year (see our Special Coverage Page here, including her fraudulent Voter Registration Form, the complaint that started it all, and much more) has taken several bizarre twists this morning as Palm Beach Post columnist Jose Lambiet once again steps up with several fresh scoops in the matter, and The BRAD BLOG, who, as of today's article, has now become a corollary in the story, has an exclusive detail or two of our own to offer on the heels of this morning's Post report. First, Lambiet reports that the Palm Beach Sheriffs Office, which had been investigating the matter, has closed the case after an FBI agent interceded on Coulter's behalf. The PBSO had been investigating Coulter's fraudulent, knowing use of the wrong address on her voter registration form, a third-degree felony, and the fact that she subsequently, knowingly voted at the wrong precinct. Second, the reason offered by the FBI man for Coulter's use of a phony address on her form --- actually that of her Palm Beach County real estate agent --- was because of claims that she was being "stalked" by a conservative BRAD BLOG guest blogger!" (nowadays, the blogs don't just report the news, the ARE the news!!!)
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4538#more-4538

AND DON'T MISS THIS, BRADBLOG'S LINK TO AMY GOODMAN'S SHOW FEATURING GREG PALAST'S INTERVIEW WITH DAVID IGLESIAS!!! (THAT'S HOW THE BLOGS WORK!) http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4551

BUSH WARS
As a massive hunt for three missing American soldiers continued into its third day on Monday, a front group for al-Qaeda in Iraq that claims to have captured them warned the U.S. military to stop searching, calling it "a venture in vain." The group suggested the abductions were to avenge the rape and killing of a 14-year-old girl in the same area and abuses committed by U.S. troops at Abu Ghraib and other prisons. (Al Qaeda is using our own tragic, unforgivable violence to turn locals against us, and to punish innocent soldiers for the crimes of others. It is very hard to be seen as liberators when these kinds of rapes and massacres can be traced back to our own soldiers. Makes one wonder, what kind of sociopathic timebombs will some of these troops bring back with them, along with their wounded psyches?)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/14/AR2007051400009.html?referrer=email

The Sadriya market has been cleaned of the pools of blood and the scattered flesh. It looked almost normal Monday as Kumail Ali Mussa stood in his car accessory shop on the street where 16 people had been killed the day before. It was 2:30 p.m. and the market, which once stayed open until sunset, was shutting down. The fact that it had opened at all was a minor miracle. This was the fourth major bombing there. The previous ones, in December, February and April, killed more than 320 people. Mussa resigned himself to coming back to the decades-old commercial center. He had gone home in shock the previous night and awakened in the morning afraid he would not survive the next attack. But with a wife, children and parents to feed, he didn't have the luxury of shutting down. "What else could I do?" he said numbly. "I don't have a degree in anything, and even then, what's the difference? People are dying indiscriminately regardless of where they are in Baghdad!" (if they rename the market "McCain Plaza", maybe all the violence will disappear into U.S. presidential political fantasyland...)
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-sadriya15may15,0,6102128.story?coll=la-tot-world&track=ntottext

Boston University professor Andrew J. Bacevich has been a persistent, vocal critic of the Iraq war, calling the conflict a catastrophic failure. This week, the retired Army lieutenant colonel received the grim news that his son had been killed on patrol there. First Lieutenant Andrew J. Bacevich , 27, of Walpole, died Sunday in Balad of wounds he suffered after a bomb explosion, the military said yesterday. The soldier, who graduated from BU in 2003 with a degree in communications, is the 56th service member from Massachusetts to be killed in Iraq. His father, a veteran of the Vietnam and Gulf wars, has criticized the war in his writings and described President Bush's endorsement of such "preventive wars" as "immoral, illicit, and imprudent." ( I can not imagine this man's grief, my own sons and daughter are my primary concern in all of this. Just what have we done???)
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/05/15/son_of_professor_opposed_to_war_is_killed_in_iraq/

Opposition parties shut down the southern port city of Karachi and slowed commerce in other parts of the country with a strike on Monday to protest the deaths of at least 39 people in political violence over the weekend. The situation in Karachi, the nation’s commercial and financial hub, was described as “tense but under control” on Monday by law enforcement officials. Thousand of paramilitary troops were called in to patrol the streets after being given the authority to “shoot and kill” anyone involved in more violence. “The city is totally paralyzed,” Azhar Farooqi, the Karachi police chief, was quoted as saying by Reuters. “Shops are closed, and very little public transport is on the roads. People are scared.” The strike and street clashes are one of the most serious challenges to face Gen. Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan’s president, since he took power in a bloodless coup in 1999. The clashes, between government supporters and opposition parties, were set off Saturday by the arrival of Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, the Supreme Court chief justice who was suspended by President Musharraf in March. (can our next president suspend OUR Supreme Court judges???)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/15/world/asia/15pakistan.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin

Gunmen opened fire Monday on U.S., Pakistani and Afghan officials meeting near the volatile Afghan-Pakistani frontier. An American soldier and a Pakistani soldier were killed and several others wounded, officials said. The border fighting, about a mile inside Pakistani territory, coincided with continuing civil strife over Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's efforts to sideline the chief justice of the Supreme Court, a struggle that threatens the general's grip on power. Pakistan's largest city, Karachi, has been virtually shut down by the unrest, which has left more than 40 people dead since the weekend. Shops were closed and most public transport halted as the opposition called for a general strike. Paramilitary police were given shoot-to-kill orders against anyone involved in street violence. (this "Bush War" is spilling over into new territory)
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-pakistan15may15,0,2607964.story?coll=la-tot-world&track=ntottext

DOJ ATTORNEY FIRING SCANDAL CLAIMS ANOTHER VICTIM
Paul J. McNulty, a career Republican operative who rose to the No. 2 spot at the Department of Justice, announced his resignation Monday in the midst of the widening scandal over the firings of eight U.S. attorneys. His exit marks the fourth resignation since the matter became public this year. It is all the more dramatic because of his high rank — deputy attorney general — in the Bush administration. McNulty has admitted misleading Congress about the reasons for the dismissals. Though he maintained he was out of the loop about the terminations, documents showed he attended a crucial meeting with Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales and others to review a final list of prosecutors to be fired. (another one bites the dust)
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-mcnulty15may15,0,3258743.story

AND DON'T MISS THIS, BRADBLOG'S LINK TO AMY GOODMAN'S SHOW FEATURING GREG PALAST'S INTERVIEW WITH DAVID IGLESIAS!!! (AND THAT'S HOW "THE BLOGS" WORK!) http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4551


WOLFOWITZ WORLD BANK GAL PAL SCANDAL
A World Bank committee charged Monday that Paul D. Wolfowitz violated ethical and governance rules as bank president by showing favoritism to his companion in 2005. In response, the Bush administration mounted a last-ditch global campaign to save Mr. Wolfowitz from being ousted from office. On a day of rapid developments that intensified the furor over Mr. Wolfowitz at the bank, in the Bush administration and at government ministries around the world, the special committee that has investigated his conduct in the last month issued a scathing set of conclusions that seemed certain to hasten a decision on Mr. Wolfowitz’s fate. The report charged that Mr. Wolfowitz broke bank rules and the ethical obligations in his contract, and that he tried to hide the salary and promotion package awarded to Shaha Ali Riza, his companion (there's the money-shot) and a bank employee, from top legal and ethics officials in the months after he became bank president in 2005. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/15/washington/15wolfowitz.html?th&emc=th

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Tuesday Morning News

Red text is the "real" story buried in the news.
Blue text is my own commentary.
Violet text is the blog quote of the day.

BUSH WARS
The deaths of more than 100 American troops in April made it the deadliest month so far this year for U.S. forces in Iraq, underscoring the growing exposure of Americans as thousands of reinforcements arrive for an 11-week-old offensive to tame sectarian violence.
More than 60 Iraqis also were killed or found dead across Iraq on Monday. Casualties among Iraqi civilians and security forces have outstripped those of Americans throughout the war. In March, a total of 2,762 Iraqi civilians and policemen were killed, down 4 percent from the previous month, when 2,864 were killed. Iraq's government has yet to release any monthly totals for April. (...and they aren't going to release them anymore, it seems, can't imagine why...)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/30/AR2007043001929.html?referrer=email

The largest bloc of Sunni Arabs in the Iraqi Parliament threatened to withdraw its ministers from the Shiite-dominated cabinet on Monday in frustration over the government’s failure to deal with Sunni concerns. The bloc, known as the Iraqi Consensus Front and made up of three Sunni Arab parties, “has lost hope in rectifying the situation despite all of its sincere and serious efforts to do so,” the statement said. If the Sunni group followed through on its threat, it would further weaken a government already damaged by the pullout two weeks ago of six cabinet ministers aligned with the renegade Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr and further erode American efforts to promote reconciliation between Sunnis and Shiites. (...1400 years of vendetta, and the U.S. is going to step in and fix it??? RIIIIGHTTT. Try food instead of guns, feed em', don't fight em', maybe they will begin to trust us as an honest broker, not an international oil thief...)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/01/world/middleeast/01iraq.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin

Brushing aside White House opposition, Republican leaders in Congress said yesterday that negotiations on a second war spending bill should begin with benchmarks of success (how about our own contractors accounting for all that wasted reconstruction money) for the Iraqi government, and possible consequences if those benchmarks are not met. Democratic leaders will send a $124 billion war funding bill to President Bush today that would establish such benchmarks and tie them to troop withdrawals, which would begin as early as July 1 if they are not met. The bill will arrive at the White House on the fourth anniversary of Bush's speech aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, when he declared an end to major combat operations in Iraq before a banner that proclaimed "Mission Accomplished."
(..how ironically appropriate...)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/30/AR2007043001527.html?referrer=email

"A new study ordered by the Pentagon warns that the rising cost and dwindling supply of oil -- the lifeblood of fighter jets, warships, and tanks -- will make the US military's ability to respond to hot spots around the world "unsustainable in the long term." The study, produced by a defense consulting firm, concludes that all four branches of the military must "fundamentally transform" their assumptions about energy, including taking immediate steps toward fielding weapons systems and aircraft that run on alternative and renewable fuels."
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/05/01/pentagon_study_says_oil_reliance_strains_military/

VOTER FRAUD FRAUD
A GOP-majority committee split along party lines to send the Senate a substitute version of the House-approved measure requiring voters to prove their identity before casting ballots. Sen. Troy Fraser, R-Horseshoe Bay, tweaked the House-approved proposal by not exempting any voters from the identification requirement. ...Proponents, including the Republican Party of Texas, say it’s necessary to reduce chances of voter fraud....Opponents, including the Texas Democratic Party, say the changes attack a problem (voter impersonation) that doesn’t exist. They also say the mandate will serve mainly to drive down turnout of minorities, the elderly and the young.
(...Kansas' Republican controlled legislature is doing the same thing, the Red States are getting more desperate every day trying to prevent their "redness" from turning purple or blue...)
http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/legislature/index.html

DOJ SCANDAL
SYSTEMIC FEDERAL POLITICIZATION UNDER INTERNAL SCRUTINY
Don't miss this editorial, it really goes to the core of the DOJ scandal, and why Bush kkeps giving Gone-Zo the vote of confidence...!!!
"NO MATTER how many members of Congress lose confidence in Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales, President Bush is unlikely to let him go. If Gonzales resigns, the vacancy must be filled by a new presidential nominee, and the last thing the White House wants is a confirmation hearing. All this is reminiscent of the Watergate scandal. In 1973, as the coverup was unraveling, the Senate imposed a condition on the confirmation of President Nixon's nominee for attorney general, Elliot Richardson. Richardson's predecessor had resigned because of Watergate troubles. Concerned that the Justice Department would not get at the truth, the Senate insisted that Richardson would name a special prosecutor to investigate Watergate. Richardson duly appointed Archibald Cox. The rest is history. Cox's aggressive investigations led to the prosecution of top administration officials and the naming of Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator in the coverup. When Cox sought White House tapes of Nixon's conversations with his staff, the president had him fired, unleashing a firestorm of protests. Americans demanded that a previously reluctant Congress start impeachment proceedings against Nixon. Congress complied; the House Judiciary Committee, of which I was a member, voted for impeachment, and Nixon resigned. Aspects of this history could easily repeat themselves. The Senate could demand, as it did in 1973, that a new attorney general appoint a special prosecutor, (...sounds like a plan...) and this could again have dire consequences for the White House."
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-holtzman1may01,0,3365495.story?track=ntothtml

A true US Attorneys/Abramoff link uncovered...
(Thanx to emptywheel at "The Next Hurrah" for this link to MPW at "Wampum")
...And boy, is it a doozy!
"The discussion has continued over at Marcy's place, spurred on by this excellent post documenting recent changes in the make-up of the Native American Issues Subcommittee at the DoJ. Of particularly interesting note, the 2006 appointment of Colorado USA, Troy Eid. Seems that Eid was a 2003 hire of Greenberg Traurig in their Denver office. While Eid tried to whitewash his involvement in the firm at the same time as Abramoff's tenure, such claims turn out to be patently false. First, from the Denver Post upon Eid's appointment: Eid, a shareholder at the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, practices land use and environmental law, federal Indian law, American Indian tribal law, business negotiations and public law. Jack Abramoff, the Washington lobbyist who recently pleaded guilty to bribery, mail fraud and other charges, previously worked at Greenberg Traurig. Eid and Abramoff both worked in divisions that represented American Indian tribes. But Eid has said he joined Greenberg Traurig in 2003, about the time Abramoff was being fired. However, not only did Eid and Abramoff overlap in 2003-2004 (Abramoff wasn't fired until March, 2004), Eid was directly involved in at least two clients handled by "Team Abramoff". (...triple snark; Bush doesn't remember knowing Jack, either...)
http://wampum.wabanaki.net/vault/2007/05/003621.html

So, is Bloch the next Archie Cox,
OR IS HE JUST RUNNING COVER?
At first glance, Scott J. Bloch seems to fit the profile of the "loyal Bushie," the kind of person the White House salted through the Washington bureaucracy to make sure federal agencies heeded administration priorities. But Bloch, 48, is a man who defies expectations. The lifelong Republican runs an agency — the Office of Special Counsel — that is turning its investigative spotlight on the White House, in particular the political operation headed by Karl Rove. His office is investigating whether Bush administration personnel violated civil statutes by inserting GOP electoral politics into Cabinet agency meetings, firing at least one U.S. attorney, and discussing some of the activities in private e-mails that are missing...Bloch says he felt compelled to initiate the broad investigation after reviewing results from two seemingly separate inquiries. The first was a preliminary interview with the fired U.S. attorney from New Mexico, David C. Iglesias, who said, among other things, that his termination might have resulted from his failure to swiftly pursue a corruption case against Democrats.The second involved a PowerPoint presentation highlighting upcoming battleground election races that a Rove aide, J. Scott Jennings, made at the General Services Administration this year.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-bloch1may01,0,2406788.story?track=ntothtml

And this from Murray Wass at The National Journal,
Waas is really covering this DOJ scandal from the roots up, he broke the story yesterday about Gone-Zo's secret deal giving sweeping hire-and-fire powers to young, inexperienced, and hostile partisan politicos at the DOJ...
"Shortly before Attorney General Alberto Gonzales advised President Bush last year on whether to shut down a Justice Department inquiry regarding the administration's warrantless domestic eavesdropping program, Gonzales learned that his own conduct would likely be a focus of the investigation, according to government records and interviews. Bush personally intervened to sideline the Justice Department probe in April 2006 by taking the unusual step of denying investigators the security clearances necessary for their work."
http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0315nj1.htm


ANOTHER TOP DOJ "OUT-OF-THE-LOOPER"
ADMITS ONLY IGNORANCE
Deputy Attorney General Paul J. McNulty told congressional investigators that he had limited involvement in the firing last year of eight U.S. attorneys and that he did not choose any to be removed, congressional aides familiar with his statements said yesterday. McNulty said he provided erroneous testimony to Congress in February because he had not been informed that Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and his aides had been working with the White House on the firings for nearly two years, the congressional aides said.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/30/AR2007043001526.html?referrer=email&referrer=email&referrer=email

"CHILDREN" IN CHARGE OF THE DOJ PERSONNEL DECISIONS
In a previously undisclosed move, Gonzales approved an order in March 2006 that delegated to his chief of staff and the department's White House liaison broad authority over 135 department positions designated for political appointees, a copy of the order obtained by The Times shows. Their authority did not cover high-level positions that required Senate confirmation, such as the 93 U.S. attorneys. (that might be somewhat inaccurate, it seems as if these two had quite a hand even in that highest-level hiring process, especially Griffin's appointment in Arkansas) Gonzales' chief of staff at the time was D. Kyle Sampson, who resigned in March after it became known that he was the point man on the controversial firing of eight U.S. attorneys last year. Not long after the order was signed, the position of White House liaison was filled by Monica M. Goodling, a former Justice Department public affairs officer. She recently resigned because of disclosures about her role in the firings. Some Democrats on Capitol Hill, where two committees are investigating allegations of improper political interference at the Justice Department, said they were troubled by the disclosure and how Sampson and Goodling might have exercised their powers. (apparently they did it with a neoconic iron hand...)
http://email.latimes.com/cgi-bin1/DM/y/hBOJ40RvPwf0G2B0IXxq0E3

85 US-A CO-CONSPIRATORS? (also see this previous post)
When a jury acquitted Carl J. Marlinga, a former county prosecutor from suburban Detroit, of bribery charges last year, his initial reaction was to write off the episode as a terrible mistake that at least had been corrected. “Prosecutors can make mistakes for innocent reasons,” Mr. Marlinga said. “I know that first hand.” But as he looks back at the case, Mr. Marlinga, 60, who was charged while he was a Democratic candidate for Congress, no longer has such confidence in the integrity of the legal system. “Was there some extra pressure on the United States attorney’s office, whether articulated or tacitly understood, by their superiors in Washington who would not look favorably upon the office if this case was not pursued?” he asked. “I have to wonder.” That kind of second guessing has surfaced with increasing frequency in recent weeks in states including Alabama, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Since the dismissals of eight United States attorneys, local lawyers, politicians, editorial writers, members of Congress and defendants are questioning what they say is a pattern of investigating Democrats. They point to inquiries that drag on for years but end with no charges, an acquittal or convictions for relatively modest infractions.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/01/washington/01corrupt.html?ei=5088&en=301d72e7b39b9fca&ex=1335672000&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=all

WHICH BRINGS US TO THE BLOG QUOTE OF THE DAY
...and today is a first, I'm quoting myself in an older post...
85 US Attorneys as co-conspirators? from "Between the Lines" 3/18/2007
"Let me press the issue of the SURVIVING US-A's, if Iowa is any indicator, there is an ongoing conspiracy against Democrats, by Republican-planted US-A's, and it may have actually accelerated since this exposure of their colleagues questionable removal and replacements. Matt McCoy, the Democratic state senator from Des Moines' south side, is being persecuted in a classic case of entrapment, by the US-A that was appointed to that district. If there's a provable passel of politics in this process, wouldn't these US-A's themselves be subject to some serious scrutiny from Congress? One thing is for certain, it immediately opens the door for McCoy's defense attorney to demand charges be dropped. This political hackery makes our US-A's impotent."
http://jep-betweenthelines.blogspot.com/2007_03_01_archive.html

WOLFOWITZ REFUSES TO GO QUIETLY,
BRINGS HIGH-PAID GAL PAL TO COURT WITH HIM
Wolfowitz, an architect of the Iraq war as deputy U.S. Defense secretary from 2001 to 2005, appeared with his partner, Shaha Ali Riza, and his lawyer, Robert S. Bennett, before an investigative committee of the bank's board Monday to plead his case. The investigative panel met behind closed doors into the evening without resolving the issue. While the committee was meeting, Wolfowitz received an endorsement from President Bush, his former boss, (and Iraq War co-conspirator) but only a noncommittal statement from a key European official. ...Bush nominated Wolfowitz to the World Bank job in 2005. But the bank's board, whose 24 members come from 24 countries, will decide his future. The board includes Germany, whose chancellor, Angela Merkel, met Monday with Bush. Merkel, appearing with Bush, offered Wolfowitz no endorsement, saying only that the bank board's inquiry "should be a very transparent conversation." The Europeans, with whom the Iraq war has never been popular, are among Wolfowitz's most outspoken detractors on the bank's board. However, the board has never unseated a bank president, and bylaws apparently do not contemplate the possibility.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-wolfowitz1may01,0,3103606.story?track=ntothtml

UNIONS TAKE ON BEHEMOTH WAL MART
In its first study of how an American company treats its workers, Human Rights Watch said Monday that Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s aggressive efforts to keep out labor unions often violated federal law and infringed on workers' rights. The group said that when Wal-Mart stores faced efforts to unionize employees, the company often broke the law by eavesdropping on workers, training surveillance cameras on them and firing those who favored unions, among other actions. "While many American companies use weak U.S. laws to stop workers from organizing, the retail giant stands out for the sheer magnitude and aggressiveness of its anti-union apparatus," the group wrote. Wal-Mart has more than 1.3 million workers at almost 4,000 U.S. stores, and none belongs to a union. (.. the lowest wages, ALWAYS!..)
http://www.statesman.com/business/content/business/stories/other/05/01/1walmart.html


THE ENVIRONMENT
The Bush administration proposed on Monday leasing out millions of acres along the coasts of Alaska and Virginia to oil and gas drillers, a move that would end a longstanding ban on drilling in those environmentally sensitive areas. Both areas have been closed to new drilling for many years. The areas off Virginia are still covered by laws that prohibit new drilling in all areas along the Atlantic and Pacific seaboards. But Congress lifted the prohibition on Bristol Bay off Alaska in 2003, and President Bush lifted an executive order in January that had blocked drilling there through 2012. In the case of Virginia, administration officials are hoping to capitalize on interest in drilling expressed by the state legislature, which passed a bill last year asking the federal government to allow exploration for natural gas in waters 50 miles or farther from the state coastline. Both proposals are part of a broader five-year plan to open up 48 million acres along the outer continental shelf to oil and gas drilling. Unless Congress objects within 60 days, most of the five-year plan will go into effect, though resistance has been voiced. Starting this year, the Interior Department plans to offer leases on about 8.3 million acres in the central region of the Gulf of Mexico, which Congress specifically approved for offshore drilling late last year. (...before they leave, the neocons plan their final travesty...)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/01/washington/01drill.html?th&emc=th

The United States and China want to amend a major report by U.N.-sponsored climate researchers to play down its conclusion that quick, affordable action can limit the worst effects of global warming, according to documents reviewed Monday by The Associated Press. The critiques, among hundreds of government comments on the draft, are the prelude to what is expected to be a contentious weeklong meeting as scientists and national delegations wrangle over final wording (to spin the truth) in the report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, to be issued Friday.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/313789_climate01.html

Monday, April 16, 2007

Monday Morning Carry-over

This will be a slim week on Between the lines. Got to go to KC for a couple days, so I won't be lining up the headlines every morning. But readership here is still small. I hope that, eventually, my daily perspective encourages many of you to come here for a morning overview, a quick red-letter synopsis of the daily news that you can skim for THE hot headlines and other curiosities that I have marked in red text, to help find your own daily talking points. JEP
Red text is the "real" headline buried in the article.
Blue text is my own commentary.
Violet text is the blog quote of the day.

AFRICA
once again, the most important story of the day, Africa, is absent from the morning headlines in all the standard media email newsletters. Seems to be a REGULAR "Monday" thing, though, there's a pattern here...

THE MEDIA, THE INTERNET, AND THE BLOGS
Blog quote of the day, from "Media Matters"
(don't miss the rogue's gallery photo bar that accompanies this article, it's the best photo-synopsis of deceptive spinmeisters I've seen so far, minus Malkin, Coulter and Drudge, why are these women missing from the line-up?)
On April 11, NBC News announced that it was dropping MSNBC's simulcast of Imus in the Morning in the wake of the controversy that erupted over host Don Imus' reference to the Rutgers University women's basketball team as "nappy-headed hos." The following day, CBS president and CEO Leslie Moonves announced that CBS has fired Imus and would cease broadcasting his radio show. But as Media Matters for America has extensively documented, bigotry and hate speech targeting, among other characteristics, race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, and ethnicity continue to permeate the airwaves through personalities such as Glenn Beck, Neal Boortz, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage, Michael Smerconish, and John Gibson. (some of the most egregious violators of the 4th Estate's once-noble calling!)
http://mediamatters.org/items/200704120010

Stewart and Colbert viewers are more news-savvy than Fox viewers!!! (I'm not surprised, free thinkers tend to discern the truth much better than brainwashed bozos, thanx to Huffington Post for the link) Other details are equally eye-opening. Pew judged the levels of knowledgeability (correct answers) among those surveyed and found that those who scored the highest were regular watchers of Comedy Central's The Daily Show and Colbert Report. They tied with regular readers of major newspapers in the top spot -- with 54% of them getting 2 out of 3 questions correct. Watchers of the Lehrer News Hour on PBS followed just behind. Virtually bringing up the rear were regular watchers of Fox (we report, you believe) News. Only 1 in 3 (Fox viewers) could answer 2 out of 3 questions correctly. Fox topped only network morning show viewers.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003571876

Is there any tag team capable of doing more damage to the truth than over-eager warbloggers enlisting with gossip guru Matt Drudge? The two factually challenged camps joined forces last week in an effort to slime CNN's Iraq reporter Michael Ware by spreading the bogus story that he'd heckled Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) during a Baghdad press conference. It actually took less than one day for the malicious falsehood to be debunked. And in the end, Drudge and the warbloggers -- those bitter, pro-war, dead-enders -- simply made April fools of themselves for peddling the concocted tale. (Eric Boehlert is always spot-on and definitely worth a regular read...) http://mediamatters.org/columns/200704100023

... case shows that the Internet has become a virtual training camp and operations center replacing the Al Qaeda bases in Afghanistan and Bosnia that produced a legion of fighters, formed them into cells and launched them at targets. The soldiers of this looser network were more technologically and culturally agile than the grim fanatics who executed attacks in the past, according to trial evidence, court documents and interviews with investigators, defense lawyers, family and friends. They spoke more English than Arabic and listened to the rap of Kanye West along with the harangues of Abu Musab Zarqawi. Their Western ways enabled them to communicate and cross borders with ease. And investigators say they had a youthful disregard for life. (anyone else see some anti-blog propaganda leakin' out of this story? The Kanye West reference smacks of provocative-ism, surely these Bosnians also listen to Gorecki, but he never spoke truth to power like Kanye does.)http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-net16apr16,0,2180207.story

The two private equity firms seeking to buy Clear Channel Communications have sweetened their offer, fearing that their initial bid may be rejected by shareholders. In a letter to Clear Channel’s board, Bain Capital and Thomas H. Lee Partners have proposed raising their $26 billion offer, including debt, for the nation’s largest radio company, people briefed on the negotiations said yesterday. The letter proposes several alternatives, including letting shareholders co-invest in a small part of the deal, in what is known as a stub. That would allow the investors a greater return, should the deal prove successful. (more proof they only used these media forms for propaganda purposes, the robber barons don't want these low-profit enterprises if they don't produce the political results intended... the question now is, what type of people are the new owners? I can't imagine that they could be worse than the old owners, but then I didn't think W had a snowball's chance in hell in 1999) http://www2.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=352464978493976133&postID=3530095826776302687

Google will begin selling advertisements across all of the stations of Clear Channel Communications, the No. 1 radio station owner in the United States, at the end of June, the companies will announce today. Google has been working for months to expand its ad sales operation into traditional media like newspapers, radio and television. To do so, it needs traditional media companies to allow it to sell some of their ads, and it had seemed to be making little progress in radio. But the partnership with Clear Channel represents a step forward (and to the right) for Google. The deal will run for several years, and will give Google access to just under 5 percent of Clear Channel’s commercial time. That will include 30-second spots on all of Clear Channel’s 675 stations during all programs and all times of the day, executives at both companies said in interviews yesterday.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/15/AR2007041500855.html?referrer=email

Microsoft said yesterday that Google's proposed purchase of Internet advertising company DoubleClick raises antitrust and privacy concerns that deserve careful review by authorities.
Executives at the software giant said they talked over the weekend with AT&T, AOL and Yahoo about similar concerns. Microsoft had bid for DoubleClick but lost to Google. The $3.1 billion acquisition, announced late Friday, would combine the largest providers of online advertising and create a dominant force, Microsoft said. Spending on Internet advertising rose 17 percent last year from 2005, to $9.8 billion, far faster than advertising for traditional media, according to research firm TNS Media Intelligence. http://letters.washingtonpost.com/W3RH02D12A2CFE0C6446D300D38620

EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY
The report doesn't claim to speak for the multitude of products being used in classrooms, and more studies are in order, she said. Yet the inescapable conclusion, she added, is that despite all the time students spent sitting before computers, the data didn't show more than a blip of increased learning. "I don't think anyone expected it would come out so flat," she said.Actually, Don Knezek, who heads the International Society for Technology in Education, would have predicted just that outcome."There's been," he said, "a deliberate effort to discredit and eliminate technology in schools…. We've clearly seen our Department of Education and this administration sit back while we've fallen behind on the world stage in education." (more "anti-tech" mentality as the information age continues to replace the industrial age.) http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-schoolme16apr16,0,1868398.story?track=ntothtml

THE BUSH WARS
(George) Tenet is not going to get too many Christmas cards from Vice President Cheney's office after they read "At the Center of the Storm." Folks from down the river at the Pentagon, including former deputy secretary of defense Paul Wolfowitz-- a guy who's already going through a rough patch -- and former defense undersecretary Douglas Feith, might also get some heartburn...Former secretary of state Colin Powell comes out fine. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who was President Bush's key adviser in engineering the Iraq invasion, doesn't come out so fine. Not fine at all.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/15/AR2007041500653.html?


Levin said Democrats remain committed to sending Bush (just impeach him, and Cheney, for God's sake, and stop negotiating with these neocon terrorists!) a compromise package with the withdrawal language intact, to express the strong concerns among Democrats and some Republicans that the Iraq war is exacting too high a cost for the country to continue. That language is likely to track closely with the Senate approach, which sets a goal instead of a hard date. "We're going to send him, first of all, hopefully, a very strong bill which would say that we're going to begin to reduce troops in four months as a way of telling the Iraqi leadership that the open-ended commitment is over," Levin said.

BAQUBA, Iraq; The Sunni guerrillas and extremists who now overshadow this city demonstrate a sophistication and lethality born of years of confronting American military tactics. While the “surge” plays out in Baghdad just 35 miles to the south, Baquba has emerged as a magnet for insurgents from around the country and, perhaps, the next major headache for the American military. Some insurgents have moved into Baquba to escape the escalation in Baghdad. But the city has been attracting insurgents for years, particularly after American officials in Baghdad proclaimed it and surrounding Diyala Province relatively pacified (seems like every time one of our McCains or Hunters declares that the war is really "going well", or some territory is declared 'pacified,' the terrorists do something deadly to prove them wrong. But unfortunately for all of us, Iraqis and Americans alike, the terrorists just don't understand yet that these neocons do not know how to admit they are wrong...) over a year ago and drew down their troop presence. http://www.nytimes.com:80/2007/04/16/world/middleeast/16insurgency.html?th&emc=th

A key Shiite Muslim bloc in Iraq's government pledged Sunday to quit over Prime Minister Nouri Maliki's refusal to set a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops, (..you mean the Iraqis want a timetable too??? Who'd a thunk it.) a move that would further weaken the country's leadership at a time of soaring sectarian violence. The threat came on the heels of another bloody day in the capital, where at least 37 people died in bombings that underscored the failings of a U.S.-Iraqi security plan now in its third month. The victims included 17 Iraqis killed in a crowded market (John McCain's 'casual' market walk seems more and more fantastic every day) in a Shiite-dominated neighborhood, where two car bombs exploded nearly simultaneously. As people fled the chaos, mortar rounds rained down on them. Fifty people were wounded. Nine more people were killed as they stood surveying the damage from a roadside bomb that had exploded in Baghdad's central Karada district. The bomb caused no casualties, but another one went off shortly afterward outside a popular smoothie shop, near where the crowd had gathered, causing the deaths and 17 injuries. Five people also were killed in Karada when a minivan exploded, and six were killed in a Shiite neighborhood in southwest Baghdad when a suicide bomber blew himself up in a taxi. The incidents all bore the hallmarks of the car bombings and suicide attacks blamed on Sunni Arab insurgents. Political parties loyal to radical Shiite cleric Muqtada Sadr blame the U.S. troop presence for the ongoing bloodshed. Maliki faces a major blow if he loses their backing. The bloc holds six Cabinet positions and about 30 seats in the parliament, where it has greatly bolstered the prime minister's Shiite-led alliance.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iraq16apr16,0,4430303.story?track=ntothtml

The review is designed to serve as an "independent sounding board," according to a Defense Department memo, and will be co chaired by Eric Evans , an electrical engineer and director of Lincoln Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Paul E. Funk , a retired three-star Army general who publicly doubted that Iraq could be easily stabilized by military force. (another General who knew better? BEFORE the war? And how many Generals equal one Feith or Perle, when it comes to credibility in the neocon sphere of self-delusional war strategy?) Before US troops toppled Saddam Hussein in March 2003, Funk derided top Bush administration officials in several media interviews as thinking "all wars are small and will be over quickly." He also warned that US forces could be in Iraq "for years," believing that the United States did not have sufficient forces to pacify the country and would probably face years of resistance from home-grown forces. http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2007/04/16/war_strategy_critic_to_review_ied_office/

GONZALES-GATE SCANDAL GROWS EVER MORE COMPLEX
Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales offered a measured apology for his mistakes in the dismissal of eight United States attorneys, but said in testimony prepared for a Senate hearing on Tuesday (what sort of Anna/Imus red herring will the MSM fish up for us this week to cover Gonzales' continuation of this perpetual pattern of patent deception) that he had “nothing to hide” and that none of the prosecutors were removed to influence the outcome of a case. In his testimony, which was released Sunday by the Justice Department, Mr. Gonzales provided an account of his actions that was largely consistent with his past assertions that his role was very limited and his recollection fragmentary. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/16/washington/16attorneys.html?th&emc=th

The former Justice Department official who carried out the firings of eight U.S. attorneys last year told Congress that several of the prosecutors had no performance problems and that a memo on the firings was distributed at a Nov. 27 meeting attended by Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, (recorded historical chronology is a bitch, when you lie about it there's just no way to go back change it to match your lies) a Democratic senator said yesterday. The statements to House and Senate investigators by Michael A. Battle, former director of the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, represent another potential challenge to the credibility of Gonzales, who has said that he never saw any documents about the firings and that he had "lost confidence" in the prosecutors because of performance problems.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/15/AR2007041500548.html?referrer=email

WOLFOWITZ WORLD-BANK ROMANCE SCANDAL ESCALATES
Paul D. Wolfowitz’s struggle to remain as president of the World Bank was dealt a crippling setback on Sunday when its most powerful oversight committee delivered an unusually public rebuke of his leadership, expressing “great concern” about the institution’s future and the need to preserve its credibility and staff morale. Mr. Wolfowitz, responding at a news conference, vowed to stay on at the bank... The extraordinary exchange between Mr. Wolfowitz and the oversight committee, which consists of 47 of the world’s finance ministers and leaders of other international organizations, deepened the uncertainty over Mr. Wolfowitz. His future had earlier been thrown into doubt by the disclosure that he played a direct role in granting a pay raise and promotion to a female companion when she was transferred in 2005. (you're doin' a heckuva job, Wolfie, so just hang-in there!!)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/16/washington/16bank.html?th&emc=th

The reason Paul Wolfowitz should resign as president of the World Bank has nothing to do with Iraq, or his last job as No. 2 in Donald Rumsfeld’s Pentagon, or even his clashes with the bank’s directors and staff. He should resign because he made clean governance his main cause at the bank and has fallen far short of his own standards. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/16/opinion/16mon3.html?th&emc=th

IRS TARGETS MIDDLE CLASS, IGNORES CORPORATIONS AND WEALTHY REPUBLICANS
Since 2000, authorities at the Internal Revenue Service have nearly tripled audits of tax returns filed by people making $25,000 to $100,000 as part of a broad change in audit strategy. Audits of these middle-class taxpayers rose to nearly 436,000 last year, up from about 147,000 returns in 2000. For these 61 million individuals and married couples, who make up nearly half of all taxpayers, the odds of being audited rose from 1 in 377 to 1 in 140. (this is exactly what happened under Daddy Bush, creating thousands of snoopy new auditors, as the middle class got the shaft while the billionaire Republicans cheated with impunity. You might call this part of the whole Bush family legacy.)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/16/business/16tax.html?th&emc=th

THE ENVIRONMENT
Inuit hunters are falling through thinning ice and dying. Dolphins are being spotted for the first time. There's not enough snow to build igloos for shelter during hunts. As scientists work to establish the effect of global warming, explorers and hunters slogging across northern Canada and the Arctic ice cap on sled and foot are describing the realities they see on the ground. Three of them recently spoke to The Associated Press. "This is really ground zero for global warming," said Will Steger, a 62-year-old Minnesotan who has been traveling the region for 43 years and has witnessed the effect of warming on the 155,000 indigenous people of the Arctic.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/311757_ice16.html

HEMP LAWS CONFOUND ECONOMIC REASON AND SOCIAL LOGIC
Consider this: From 1982 to 2005, the federal Drug Enforcement Administration's Domestic Cannabis Eradication/Suppression program seized over 103 million marijuana plants. In recent years, an average of over 33,000 cultivation sites per year have been eradicated, representing a massive investment of law enforcement dollars and effort. The result? According to federal government estimates, in roughly the same time period, annual U.S. marijuana production increased from 1,000 metric tons to 10,000 metric tons. To put this in perspective, a study released late last year (based entirely on government figures) found that marijuana is America's number one cash crop by a whopping margin. With an estimated value of $35.8 billion in 2006, our marijuana crop exceeds the value of corn ($23.3 billion) and wheat ($7.45 billion) combined. (And keep in mind, that is just the toker's take, imagine if industrial hemp was a legal cash-crop, then ALL the farmers could profit from it, and we would have a serious renewable alternative for paper, textile, biofuels and building products. This is the reason their wholly owned MSM continues to vilify it as a "drug." Considering this much maligned plant's historic versatility, it is no wonder the dead-tree, oil and cotton industries, not to mention the pharmies and private prison industries want it kept in the shadows, creating an unprecedented prison culture of otherwise innocent, law abiding, tax-paying American citizens.)
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2007/04/13/drug_enforcement_pipe_dreams.php